Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;4:73. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00073

Table 2.

Ticks sampled from different host species in four study areas of Baringo County.

Study area Tick species Pools N (%) Cattle (%) Goats (%) Sheep (%) Dogs (%) Tortoises (%) Poultry (%)
Kampi Ya Samaki Rh. pravus 51 401 (12.07) 82 (2.47) 186 (5.6) 95 (2.86) 38 (1.14)
Ar. persicus 34 234 (7.04) 234 (7.04)
Rh. pulchellus 31 204 (6.14) 46 (1.38) 98 (2.95) 58 (1.74) 2 (0.06)
Rh. evertsi evertsi 17 133 (4) 24 (0.72) 66 (1.98) 38 (1.14) 5 (0.15)
Am. variegatum 5 33 (0.99) 19 (0.57) 5 (0.15) 9 (0.27)
Am. gemma 4 17 (0.51) 8 (0.24) 6 (0.18) 3 (0.09)
Am. sparsum 2 13 (0.39) 13 (0.39)
Am. nuttalli 1 6 (0.18) 6 (0.18)
Ruko Conservancy Rh. pravus 31 235 (7.07) 52 (1.56) 128 (2.85) 55 (1.65)
Rh. evertsi evertsi 28 219 (6.59) 59 (1.77) 46 (1.38) 68 (2.04) 46 (1.38)
Rh. pulchellus 27 209 (6.29) 114 (3.43) 46 (1.38) 30 (0.9) 19 (0.57)
Hy. truncatum 13 101 (3.04) 52 (1.56) 14 (0.42) 35 (1.05)
Am. variegatum 8 52 (1.56) 41 (1.23) 6 (0.18) 5 (0.15)
Hy. rufipes 7 47 (1.41) 28 (0.84) 7 (0.21) 6 (0.18) 6 (0.18)
Am. gemma 5 36 (1.08) 18 (0.54) 11 (0.33) 7 (0.21)
Am. sparsum 4 32 (0.96) 32 (0.96)
Am. nuttalli 2 16 (0.48) 16 (0.48)
Rh. praetextatus 8 15 (0.45) 10 (0.3) 5 (0.15)
Logumgum Rh. pravus 97 731 (22.01) 161 (4.85) 304(9.15) 202 (6.08) 64 (1.92)
Am. variegatum 26 187 (5.83) 121 (3.64) 23 (0.69) 43(1.29)
Rh. evertsi evertsi 14 110 (3.31) 25 (0.75) 24 (0.72) 15 (0.45) 46 (1.38)
Am. gemma 6 47 (1.41) 19(0.57) 5(0.15) 23 (0.69) 41 (1.23)
Am. falsomarmoreum 6 41 (1.23) 30 (0.9)
Am. sparsum 5 30 (0.9)
Kokwa Rh. pravus 16 123 (3.7) 1 (0.03) 84 (2.53) 38 (1.14)
Rh. evertsi evertsi 4 26 (0.78) 4 (0.12) 8 (0.24) 9 (0.27) 5 (0.15)
Am. gemma 4 22 (0.66) 2 (0.06) 12 (0.36) 8 (0.24)
Total 456 3,320 899 (27.07) 1,084 (32.56) 747 (22.5) 225 (6.77) 125 (3.76) 240 (7.22)

Percentages are out of the total number of ticks sampled. N, number of ticks sampled.