Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;8:114. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00114

Table 4.

Main results of meta-analyses subgroups.

Luteinizing hormone (LH) + follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) vs. FSH Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) + FSH vs. FSH Human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) vs. FSH LH + FSH vs. hCG + FSH
Oocytes retrieved (mean difference)
Overall analysis −0.20 (−0.36, −0.04) 0.24 (−2.27, 2.75) −0.92 (−1.45, −0.39) 0.39 (−0.83, 1.61)
p = 0.01 p = 0.850 p < 0.001 p = 0.530
I2 = 88% I2 = 99% I2 = 94% I2 = 96%

29 studies 7 studies 20 studies 5 studies
5,840 patients 948 patients 5,512 patients 538 patients

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist −0.35 (−0.63, −0.08) −0.43 (−0.95, 0.10)
p = 0.01 p = 0.11
I2 = 93% I2 = 93%

17 studies 16 studies
3,677 patients 3,347 patients

GnRH antagonist 0.01 (−0.13, 0.16) −2.38 (−3.10, −1.66)
p = 0.840 p < 0.001
I2 = 54% I2 = 42%

10 studies 4 studies
2,163 patients 2,165 patients

FSH/oocytes (mean difference)
Overall analysis −0.16 (−0.21, −0.11) −0.04 (−0.17, 0.09) 0.17 (0.11, 0.23) −0.25 (−0.94, 0.44)
p < 0.001 p = 0.550 p < 0.001 p = 0.480
I2 = 92% I2 = 84% I2 = 86% I2 = 90%

26 studies 6 studies 15 studies 4 studies
5,404 patients 893 patients 4,436 patients 382 patients

GnRH agonist −0.06 (−0.13, 0.01) 0.07 (−0.01, 0.14)
p = 0.080 p = 0.090
I2 = 90% I2 = 84%

18 studies 12 studies
3,613 patients 2,900 patients

GnRH antagonist −0.36 (−0.45, −0.26) 0.35 (0.25, 0.45)
p < 0.001 p < 0.001
I2 = 95% I2 = 74%

8 studies 3 studies
1,791 patients 1,536 patients

MII oocytes (mean difference)
Overall analysis −0.27 (−0.56, 0.02) −0.37 (−2.45, 1.71) −0.60 (−1.31, 0.12) −0.54 (−1.13, 0.05)
p = 0.07 p = 0.730 p = 0.10 p = 0.07
I2 = 94% I2 = 91% I2 = 89% I2 = 92%

20 studies 5 studies 11 studies 4 studies
3,544 patients 352 patients 2,871 patients 424 patients

GnRH agonist −0.50 (−1.01, 0.01) 0.15 (−1.30, 1.60)
p = 0.05 p = 0.84
I2 = 96% I2 = 86%

13 studies 7 studies
1,915 patients 706 patients

GnRH antagonist 0.04 (−0.08, 0.15) −1.36 (−1.51, −1.21)
p = 0.54 p < 0.001
I2 = 17% I2 = 0%

7 studies 4 studies
1,629 patients 2,165 patients

Embryos (mean difference)
Overall analysis −0.04 (−0.17, 0.10) 0.07 (−0.39, 0.53) 0.19 (0.07, 0.30) −0.12 (−0.19, −0.06)
p = 0.54 p = 0.77 p = 0.001 p < 0.001
I2 = 83% I2 = 74% I2 = 94% I2 = 83%

26 studies 7 studies 16 studies 4 studies
4,721 patients 918 patients 3,321 patients 500 patients

GnRH agonist −0.07 (−0.25, 0.11) 0.23 (0.10, 0.35)
p = 0.43 p < 0.001
I2 = 88% I2 = 95%

17 studies 13 studies
2,890 patients 2,589 patients

GnRH antagonist 0.03 (−0.11, 0.18) −0.02 (−0.19, 0.16)
p = 0.64 p = 0.86
I2 = 36% I2 = 74%

9 studies 3 studies
1,831 patients 732 patients

Implantation rate (mean difference)
Overall analysis 0.11 (0.00, 0.21) −0.06 (−0.03, 0.01) 0.22 (0.02, 0.23) −0.00 (−0.16, 0.15)
p = 0.05 p = 0.59 p = 0.03 p = 0.98
I2 = 99% I2 = 0% I2 = 100% I2 = 96%

15 studies 5 studies 10 studies 4 studies
2,669 patients 749 patients 3,208 patients 430 patients

GnRH agonist 0.16 (0.00, 0.31) 0.25 (−0.01, 0.51)
p = 0.05 p = 0.06
I2 = 100% I2 = 100%

10 studies 8 studies
1,256 patients 2,299 patients

GnRH antagonist 0.01 (−0.08, 0.10) 0.15 (0.13, 0.17)
p = 0.83 p < 0.001
I2 = 85% I2 = 0%

6 studies 2 studies
1,393 patients 909 patients

Pregnancy rate (odds ratio)
Overall analysis 1.20 (1.06, 1.37) 0.96 (0.72, 1.26) 1.10 (0.98, 1.22) 1.73 (1.26, 2.38)
p = 0.004 p = 0.750 p = 0.100 p < 0.001
I2 = 5% I2 = 0% I2 = 0% I2 = 48%

29 studies 8 studies 25 studies 5 studies
5,665 patients 968 patients 6,894 patients 989 patients

GnRH agonist 1.27 (1.09, 1.48) 1.17 (1.01, 1.36)
p = 0.002 p = 0.030
I2 = 9% I2 = 0%

22 studies 17 studies
3,834 patients 3,627 patients

GnRH antagonist 1.08 (0.87, 1.35) 1.10 (0.90, 1.34)
p = 0.480 p = 0.370
I2 = 0% I2 = 0%

9 studies 4 studies
1,831 patients 2,165 patients

Live birth rate (odds ratio)
Overall analysis 1.29 (0.91, 1.84) 1.13 (0.95, 1.33)
p = 0.15 p = 0.17
I2 = 45% I2 = 10%

5 studies 7 studies
164 patients 747 patients

Bold character indicates significant results.