Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun;210(6):429–436. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.189993

Table 1.

The distribution of the seven scales' results and repeat self-harm by 6 months according to predefined cut-off points

Scale, thresholds Did not repeat
(n = 338, 70%)
Repeat self-harm
(n = 145, 30%)
Total (n = 483)
Manchester Self-Harm Rule
    Low risk (0) 67 (94.4) 4 (5.6) 71 (14.7)
    Moderate/high risk (1+) 271 (65.8) 141 (34.2) 412 (85.3)

ReACT Self-Harm Rule
    Low risk (0) 79 (94.0) 5 (6.0) 84 (17.4)
    Moderate/high risk (1+) 259 (64.9) 140 (35.1) 399 (82.6)

SAD PERSONS scale
    Low (0–4) 303 (71.3) 122 (28.7) 425 (88.0)
    Moderate (5–6) 29 (58.0) 21 (42.0) 50 (10.4)
    High (7–10) 6 (75.0) 2 (25.0) 8 (1.7)

Modified SAD PERSONS scale
    Low (0–5) 267 (72.0) 104 (28.0) 371 (76.8)
    Moderate (6–8) 64 (61.5) 40 (38.5) 104 (21.5)
    High (>8) 7 (87.5) 1 (12.5) 8 (1.7)

Clinician global scale
    <5 217 (85.1) 38 (14.9) 255 (52.8)
    6+ 121 (53.1) 107 (46.9) 228 (47.2)

Patient global scale
    <5 213 (82.9) 44 (17.1) 257 (53.2)
    6+ 125 (55.3) 101 (44.7) 226 (46.8)

Barratt Impulsiveness Scalea
    <96 331 (70.3) 140 (29.7) 471 (97.5)
    97+ 7 (58.3) 5 (41.7) 12 (2.5)
a.

Cut-off based on Randall et al.20