Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;4(2):ofx063. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx063

Table 4.

Empiric Antimicrobial Agents Stratified by Site of Infection

Number (%) of Patients
Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy Infection Type
Bacteremia (N = 140) HABP (N = 21) VABP (N = 20) cUTI (N = 75) All (N = 256)
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
No treatment 8 (5.7%) 2 (9.5%) 0 18 (24.0%) 28 (10.9%)
No Gram-negative coverage 1 (0.7%) 0 1 (5.0%) 1 (1.3%) 3 (1.2%)
Gram-negative therapy 131 (93.6%) 19 (90.5%) 19 (95.0%) 56 (74.7%) 225 (87.9)
 Monotherapy 72 (51.4%) 15 (71.4%) 14 (70.0%) 47 (62.7%) 148 (57.8)
  All combination therapy 59 (42.1%) 4 (19.0%) 5 (25.0%) 9 (12.0%) 77 (30.1%)
   Dual therapy 38 (27.1%) 1 (4.8%) 3 (15.0%) 7 (9.3%) 49 (19.1%)
   3-drug combinations 19 (13.6%) 1 (4.8%) 2 (10.0%) 1 (1.3%) 23 (9.0%)
   4 and more drug combinations 2 (1.4%) 2 (9.5%) 0 1 (1.3%) 5 (2.0%)
Number Active Agents
 No active agent 71 (50.7%) 15 (71.4%) 15 (75.0%) 41 (54.7%) 142 (55.5%)
 One active agent 48 (34.3%) 3 (14.3%) 4 (20%) 15 (20.0%) 70 (27.3%)
Two active agentsa 12 (8.6%) 1 (4.8%) 0 0 13 (5.1%)

Abbreviations: cUTI, complicated urinary tract infection; HABP, hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia; VABP, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia.

aNo subjects received empiric antimicrobial therapy with more than 2 agents with antimicrobial activity against the index CRE pathogen.