Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Phys. 2017 Feb 7;146(5):054304. doi: 10.1063/1.4974993

Table IV.

Comparison of some characteristic points of the H2–CO PES. The distances are given in bohr and energies in cm−1.

R rH2 rCO VH2(rH2) VCO(rCO) Vmin Utot,min
(θ1,θ2,ϕ)=(0°,180°,0°)
Utot,15a 7.8977 1.4021 2.1319 0.0419 0.0139 -91.1649 −91.1091
Yang et al.b 8.0000 1.4011 2.1359 −85.937
Utot,Yc 8.0000 1.4011 2.1359 0.0000 1.8023 −79.626
Utot,15 8.0000 1.4011 2.1359 0.0000 1.8023 -90.2631 −88.4607
Utot,Ya,c 7.9156 1.4025 2.1319 0.0814 0.0139 -80.4394 −80.3441
(θ1,θ2,ϕ)=(0°,0°,0°)
Utot,15d 7.1398 1.4016 2.1325 0.0108 0.0103 -72.1001 −72.0789
Utot,Yc,d 7.1858 1.4015 2.1325 0.0070 0.0103 -69.1956 −69.1782
a

The global minimum.

b

The ab initio computed value reported by Yang et al., Ref. 19.

c

The value computed by us from the original Yang et al.19 intermonomer potential using the same monomers' potentials as in Utot,15.

d

The local minimum.