Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 29;6(5):1584–1598. doi: 10.3390/ma6051584

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Weight average molar mass and carbonyl group content of microcrystalline cellulose (a) and nanocrystalline cellulose ((b) dry irradiation) after treatment with different dosage of two distinct electron beam irradiation sources (10 × 106 vs. 300 × 103 eV).