Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 8.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 2017 May 8;14(6):587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285

Table 1.

Results from analyses of five other data sets. For each data set is shown: the numbers of sequences in the alignment, the number of sites in the alignment, the optimal models of SE identified using ModelFinder and IQ-TREE’s implementations of jModelTest9 and ProtTest10 (Other Methods), and the differences in terms of the ∆BIC score and RF distance between phylogenetic estimates inferred using these optimal models of SE.

Data type, source & origin Sequences    Sites ModelFinder BIC Other Methods BIC ∆BIC RF
DNA, Lassa virus7 179 3,186 SYM+R5 131,325 SYM+I+Γ4 131,540 215 16
DNA, mitochondrial, mammals3 274 7,370 GTR+R8 681,837 GTR+I+Γ4 684,469 2,632 16
DNA, nuclear, birds4 200 394,684 GTR+R8 18,891,706 GTR+I+Γ4 18,969,054 77,348 4
Protein, plastids, green plants5 360 19,449 JTT+F+R10 2,830,471 JTT+F+I+Γ4 2,838,957 8,486 4
Protein, nuclear, yeast6   23 634,530 LG+F+R7 25,629,204 LG+F+I+Γ4 25,638,043 8,839 0