Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;24(6):583–599. doi: 10.5551/jat.40006

Table 1. Study subjects.

Non-diseased group Diseased group
(n = 59) (n = 109)
Age (years) 41.7 ± 9.4 53.4 ± 15.9
Gender (male, %) 64.4 68.8
Body height (cm) 167.1 ± 7.5 166.4 ± 8.9
Body weight (kg) 65.3 ± 16.1 69.5 ± 17.1
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.3 ± 5.3 24.8 ± 4.2
TC (mg/dL) 187.0 ± 24.3 [124.1–237.6] 200.5 ± 38.9 [110.0–325.6]
LDL-Crmp (mg/dL) 109.7 ± 20.9 [60.0–159.4] 121.2 ± 35.9 [51.7–230.0]
HDL-Crmp (mg/dL) 60.7 ± 12.7 [38.2–98.9] 51.8 ± 13.3 [21.8–88.7]
TG (mg/dL) 115.2 ± 45.3 [30.8–194.2] 195.6 ± 144.6 [32.9–880.4]
Non-fasting subjects (%) 72.9 39.4
    Time since last meal (h)1) 2.8 ± 1.9 2.6 ± 1.8
Hypolipidemic agents taken (statin) (%) 0.0 56.9 (39.4)
Dyslipidemia (%)2) 0.0 88.1
Type I/V 0.0 0.9/1.8
Type IIa/IIb (FH) 0.0 (0.0) 64.2 (12.8)
    Type III 0.0 0.9
    Type IV 0.0 20.2
Cardiovascular disease (%) 0.0 21.1
Diabetes mellitus (%) 0.0 8.3
Fatty liver/alcoholic liver injury (%) 0.0 1.8
Renal disease (%) 0.0 1.8
Hyperthyroidism (%) 0.0 0.9

Data are presented as means ± SD [minima to maxima], or as percentages.

TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; RMP, reference measurement procedures; TG, triglyceride; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia

1)

Values were calculated using the postprandial samples.

2)

Phenotypes were determined by analysis of the pre-treatment lipid profiles in the fasting state, using the classification of Frederickson.