Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Glaucoma. 2017 Jun;26(6):592–601. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000621

Table 7.

Frequency of peripapillary atrophy and impact on diagnostic accuracy in the present study population.

PPA present Percentage of Normals
with a False Positive
Diagnosis of Glaucoma
Percentage of Glaucoma
Patients with a False
Negative Diagnosis of
Glaucoma

Percentage
of subjects
Number
of
subjects
Normal POAG PPA
absent
PPA
present
p
value*
PPA
absent
PPA
present
p
value
OCA1
Superior 14.1% 22 7 15 21.7% 42.9% 0.345 14.9% 6.7% 0.682
Temporal 27.5% 43 10 33 17.5% 50% 0.038 30.4% 3.0% 0.002
Inferior 16.0% 25 8 17 11.9% 37.5% 0.091 6.9% 5.9% 1
Nasal 8.3% 13 3 10 43.8% 0.0% 0.259 12.7% 10.0% 1
All 16.5% 103 28 75 24.2% 39.3% 0.108 15.3% 5.3% 0.021

OCA2
Superior 7.1% 11 3 8 14.1% 0.0% 1 24.7% 12.5% 0.675
Temporal 16.0% 25 6 19 21.3% 50% 0.142 25.7% 5.3% 0.063
Inferior 6.4% 10 3 7 12.5% 0.0% 1 9.8% 28.6% 0.176
Nasal 4.5% 7 2 5 38.5% 0.0% 0.525 20.2% 40.0% 0.289
All 8.5% 53 14 39 21.7% 21.4% 1 19.9% 15.4% 0.668

PPA: peripapillary atrophy, POAG: primary open angle glaucoma. OCA1: outer circumpapillary annulus of circular grid 1, OCA2: outer circumpapillary annulus of circular grid 2.

*

p values comparing rates of a false positive diagnosis between subjects with and without PPA

p values comparing rates of a false negative diagnosis between subjects with and without PPA