Skip to main content
. 2017 May 29;10(4):527–534. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.03.007

Table 2.

Univariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors for the Whole Cohort

End Points HR (95% CI) P End Points HR (95% CI) P
OS LRFS
Age, ≤50 years vs >50 years 2.72 (1.48-4.97) .001 Age, ≤50 years vs >50 years 1.16 (0.59-2.28) .671
Sex, men vs women 0.31 (0.11-0.86) .025 Sex, men vs women 1.48 (0.76-2.86) .248
Histology, WHO II vs WHO III 1.21 (0.29-5.02) .794 Histology, WHO II vs WHO III 1.05 (0.25-4.35) .947
History of smoking, no vs yes 2.17 (1.18-3.99) .012 History of smoking, no vs yes 0.76 (0.39-1.50) .427
T stage, T1-2 vs T3-4 2.14 (0.95-4.82) .066 T stage, T1-2 vs T3-4 1.28 (0.63-2.63) .493
N stage, N0-1 vs N2-3 1.97(0.99-3.92) .054 N stage, N0-1 vs N2-3 0.96 (0.40-2.28) .925
Clinical stage, II-III vs IVA-B 2.79 (1.50-5.17) .001 Clinical stage, II-III vs IVA-B 1.05 (0.48-2.28) .897
Primary dose, ≤68 vs >68 Gy 0.79 (0.43-1.47) .455 Primary dose, ≤68 vs >68 Gy 0.82 (0.44-1.53) .526
Cervical dose, ≤66 vs >66 Gy 1.80 (0.94-3.45) .078 Cervical dose, ≤66 vs >66 Gy 1.13 (0.57-2.22) .727
Treatment, CCRT vs NACT + CCRT 1.24 (0.67-2.31) .979 Treatment, CCRT vs NACT + CCRT 1.13 (0.59-2.14) .715



DMFS PFS
Age, ≤50 years vs >50 years 1.37 (0.61-3.05) .443 Age, ≤50 years vs > 50years 1.68 (1.04-2.72) .033
Sex, men vs women 0.51 (0.18-1.48) .215 Sex, men vs women 0.82 (0.46-1.44) .482
Histology, WHO II vs WHO III 0.70 (0.17-2.95) .625 Histology, WHO II vs WHO III 0.91 (0.33,2.50) .858
History of smoking, no vs yes 1.05 (0.48-2.29) .904 History of smoking, no vs yes 1.38 (0.86-2.20) .179
T stage, T1-2 vs T3-4 1.21 (0.51-2.87) .658 T stage, T1-2 vs T3-4 1.48 (0.85-2.58) .170
N stage, N0-1 vs N2-3 2.29 (1.00-5.24) .049 N stage, N0-1 vs N2-3 1.59 (0.91-2.77) .105
Clinical stage, II-III vs IVA-B 2.51 (1.15-5.49) .021 Clinical stage, II-III vs IVA-B 1.76 (1.06-2.94) .029
Primary dose, ≤68 vs >68 Gy 1.18 (0.55-2.51) .668 Primary dose, ≤68 vs >68 Gy 0.83 (0.51-1.32) .426
Cervical dose, ≤66 vs >66 Gy 2.09 (0.95-4.60) .068 Cervical dose, ≤66 vs >66 Gy 1.40 (0.84-2.32) .194
Treatment, CCRT vs NACT + CCRT 0.78 (0.34-1.78) .555 Treatment, CCRT vs NACT + CCRT 1.21 (0.75-1.95) .428

Values in bold are significant (P < .05).

P values were calculated with an adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model.