Skip to main content
. 2017 May 13;7(2):243–248. doi: 10.1007/s13555-017-0181-6

Table 1.

Change from baseline in EQ-5D utility scores at week 16, with censoring after rescue treatment and last-observation-carried-forward for imputation of missing data (full analysis set)

Placebo qw, n = 460 Dupilumab 300 mg qw, n = 462 Dupilumab 300 mg q2w, n = 457
All patients
 Baseline, mean (SD) 0.611 (0.340) 0.607 (0.338) 0.629 (0.319)
 LS mean change (SE) 0.031 (0.012) 0.207 (0.012) 0.210 (0.012)
 P vs. placeboa <0.0001 <0.0001
Respondersb
 IGA, n (%) 43 (9.3) 169 (36.6)c 170 (37.2)c
  Baseline, mean (SD) 0.746 (0.33) 0.664 (0.30) 0.668 (0.30)
  LS mean change (SE) 0.192 (0.02) 0.261 (0.01) 0.238 (0.01)
  P vs. placeboa 0.2951 0.8232
 EASI ≥50%, n (%) 107 (23.3) 282 (61.0)c 306 (67.0)c
  Baseline, mean (SD) 0.693 (0.334) 0.636 (0.314) 0.627 (0.325)
  LS mean change (SE) 0.189 (0.016) 0.255 (0.010) 0.253 (0.010)
  P vs. placeboa 0.0003 0.0004
 EASI ≥75%, n (%) 61 (13.3) 232 (50.2)c 218 (47.7)c
  Baseline, mean (SD) 0.712 (0.347) 0.629 (0.314) 0.631 (0.327)
  LS mean change (SE) 0.251 (0.020) 0.262 (0.010) 0.257 (0.011)
  P vs. placeboa 0.6089 0.7825

EASI Eczema Area and Severity Index, EQ-5D 5-dimension 3-level EuroQol, IGA Investigator’s Global Assessment, LS least squares, qw once weekly, q2w every 2 weeks

aTreatments were compared using analysis of covariance with baseline as covariate and treatment, region, and baseline IGA strata as fixed factors; a study identifier was included as an additional factor for the pooled analysis

bResponders were defined as patients who achieved at week 16 an IGA score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) and a reduction from baseline ≥2 points; and improvements ≥50% and ≥75% in the EASI

c P < 0.001 vs. placebo for proportion of responders