Table 2.
Needle characteristics are compared based on needle length, size, and design (systematic literature review 2016 [1])
| Needle | Comparison | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Regular (70–90 mm) | Adults | — |
| Long (>90 mm) | Obesity | Challenging approach | |
| Diameter in gauge | Small (≥24G) | Reduced complication rates Reduced pain and discomfort Decreased risk factor: blood contaminations Requires less medical assistance and medications |
Decreased flow rates, increased sampling times More failures Requires training and practice |
| Large (≤22G) | Increased flow rates Decreased sampling times Fewer failures |
Increased complication rates Perforations are larger Increased risk factor: contaminations |
|
| Design | Cutting bevel | Penetration is felt through skin | Increased complication rates. Requires more use of medications and medical assistance, which results in increased costs. |
| Atraumatic | Reduced complication rates Reduced medical health care costs due to less post-LP complications, medical assistance, and medications Decreased traumatic taps |
Decreased flow rates, increased sampling times Increased amount of attempts and failures Penetration through skin is difficult to feel |
Abbreviation: G, gauge.