. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Dec 4;63(9):1925–1932. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2505507

TABLE I.

Model identification, Selection and results.

	Run test	Precision (mean CV)	WRSS (mean ± SD)	Estimated parameters	AIC (mean ± SD)
C-peptide
Model I	81%	7%	267±430	α, Φ_d, Φ_s, h	275±430
Model II	87%	7%	255±350	α, Φ_d, Φ_s, h	263±350
Model III	84%	7%	256±343	α, Φ_d, Φ_s, h	264±343
Model IV	90%	>10⁴ %	245±319	α, Φ_d, Φ_s, h	253±319
Model V	89%	>10⁴%	253±325	α, Φ_d, Φ_s, h	261±325
Model VI	93%	6%	148±100	α, Φ_d, Φ_s, h	156±100
Model VII	88%	247%	237±323	α, Φ_d, Φ_s, h	245±323

Insulin
Model I	89%	12%	272±158	a_G	274±158
Model II	91%	10%	268±121	a_I	270±121
Model III	94%	203%	248±117	a_I, a_G	252±117
Model IV	59%	96%	329±152	a_G, V_P, m₁, m₄	337±152
Model V	67%	5%	427±251	a_I, V_P, m₁, m₄	435±251
Model VI	98%	22%	124±57	a_G, V_P, m₁, m₄, m₅, m₆	136±57
Model VII	94%	10%	227±164	a_I, V_P, m₁, m₄, m₅, m₆	239±164