Skip to main content
. 2017 May 24;284(1855):20170248. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0248

Table 1.

Model comparison table. Among all possible models, the best model supported by the evidence (with an AICc weight greater than 0) includes a three-way interaction between the complexity of the task, the direction of social comparison and similarity. K stands for the number of parameters, LL for log-likelihood, AICc for the corrected Akaike information criterion, ΔAICc for the difference in AICc between the current model and the best-fitting model, and AICcWT for the corrected weight of evidence that supports the model. The models are ordered according to their AICc.

model K LL AICc ΔAICc AICcWt
complexity × comparison × similarity 13 −986 675.3 1 973 377 0 1
complexity × comparison 9 −986 689.7 1 973 397 20.65 0
complexity × comparison + similarity 10 −986 689 1 973 398 21.35 0
complexity 7 −986 696.7 1 973 407 30.74 0
complexity + comparison 8 −986 695.7 1 973 407 30.76 0
complexity + similarity 8 −986 695.8 1 973 408 30.87 0
complexity + comparison + similarity 9 −986 695.1 1 973 408 31.43 0
complexity × similarity 9 −986 695.2 1 973 408 31.67 0
complexity × similarity + comparison 10 −986 694.5 1 973 409 32.23 0
similarity 7 −988 174.2 1 976 362 2985 0
comparison 7 −988 173.8 1 976 362 2985 0
intercept 6 −988 175.1 1 976 362 2985 0