Skip to main content
. 2017 May 24;284(1855):20170554. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0554

Table 2.

Model output from all GAMMs analysing behavioural responses in recognition trials with their standard errors, estimates and p-values. Significant p-values (p ≤ 0.05) are indicated in italics.

model: response variable predictor variables estimate standard error p-value
approaches manipulation type (saline) −0.1 0.09 0.1
meeting type (second) −0.3 0.1 <0.001
sex (male) 0.2 0.2 0.5
time in captivity −0.02 0.02 0.5
checks manipulation type (saline) 0.2 0.03 <0.001
meeting type (second) −0.2 0.03 <0.001
sex (male) −0.01 0.1 0.9
time in captivity −0.02 0.007 0.03
aggressive interactions manipulation type (saline) 0.3 0.05 <0.001
meeting type (second) 0.03 0.06 0.6
sex (male) 0.2 0.5 0.7
time in captivity −0.1 0.02 <0.001
proximity manipulation type (saline) −687.9 240.1 0.005
meeting type (second) −141.5 255.8 0.6
interaction term (manipulation and meeting type) 717.6 362.2 0.05
sex (male) −10.03 199.1 0.9
time in captivity 77.5 39.6 0.06