Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 9;64(2):114–119. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.191

Table 2.

Comparison of target volumes isodose coverage (%) between the standard plan (SP) and left anterior descending coronary artery – shielded plan (LADSP)

SP (% volume) LADSP (% volume) P value
CTVbreast 90% isodose coverage 99.37 99.07 0.0032
95% isodose coverage 97.61 97.22 0.0005
100% isodose coverage 84.32 83.56 0.0001
CTVboost 90% isodose coverage 99.97 99.97 0.3223
95% isodose coverage 99.34 99.32 0.4890
100% isodose coverage 59.13 59.13 0.9851
Dmax (Gy) 61.89 61.93 0.0753
PTVbreast Eval 90% isodose coverage 98.7 97.69 <0.0001
95% isodose coverage 95.91 94.58 <0.0001
100% isodose coverage 79.1 77.41 <0.0001
PTVboost Eval 90% isodose coverage 99.85 99.82 0.0952
95% isodose coverage 95.56 95.26 0.0096
100% isodose coverage 43.46 43.27 0.4308
Dmax (Gy) 61.96 61.98 0.0441

SP, standard plan; LADSP, left anterior descending coronary artery – shielded plan; CTV, clinical target volume; PTV, planning target volume.