Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 22;117(6):2163–2178. doi: 10.1152/jn.00240.2016

Table 2.

Summary distributions of synapse and CtBP2 puncta densities within the topographical regions of control and microgravity utricles (n = 4 each)

Parameter Region Gravity Condition Percentile
N 10 25 50 75 90 P
Synapse density, count/hair cell Medial extrastriola Control 48 6.94 8.19 9.72 12.36 16.02 0.0027
Microgravity 48 5.04 5.81 6.92 8.37 9.43
Striola Control 70 2.26 2.76 3.61 4.54 5.52 0.85
Microgravity 68 1.83 2.74 3.77 4.75 5.95
Horizontal crista Control 24 5.88 7.19 9.62 10.86 17.36 0.48
Microgravity 24 3.76 5.74 9.01 12.06 13.30
CtBP2 puncta,
count/hair cell
Medial extrastriola Control 48 8.23 10.16 14.80 17.57 22.58 0.074
Microgravity 48 7.08 8.10 10.74 12.62 15.21
Striola Control 70 4.31 6.50 8.30 9.79 11.69 0.082
Microgravity 68 6.20 7.52 9.43 11.38 13.48
Horizontal crista Control 24 9.43 10.52 12.52 14.73 19.81 0.99
Microgravity 24 8.38 9.42 12.83 18.49 21.15

Data are percentiles of synapse and CtBP2 puncta densities within the specified topographical regions of control and microgravity utricles (n = 4 each). N value reflects the total number of measurements included in the distribution, including those made by 2 “observers” on the same specimens. Specimens included, in general, 3 subregions from each area (2 for medial extrastriola, 3 from striola, and 1 from the horizontal crista) within the topographical regions specified. As discussed in methods, appropriate consideration of nonindependent measures was a critical component of implementation of the linear mixed-effects analytical model.