Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 1;58(6):1196–1203. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P073288

TABLE 2.

Percent differences in the concentration of HDL with and without apoC-III by anthropometry and physical activity in participants of the Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health study

Age- and Sex-Adjusted Percent Difference (95% CI)a
Exposures HDL Containing apoC-III HDL Not Containing apoC-III
Waist circumference (per 15 cm) 2.80 (0.36, 5.30) −4.70 (−5.95, −3.42)
Waist-to-hip ratio (per 0.1 units) 2.83 (0.26, 5.46) −3.93 (−5.28, −2.57)
BMI (per 5 kg/m2) 2.13 (−0.03, 4.35) −3.83 (−4.97, −2.69)
 BMI categories (kg/m2)
  25 to <30 versus <25 0.72 (−3.11, 4.71) −3.18 (−5.25, −1.06)
  >30 versus <25 7.00 (1.80, 12.48) −9.22 (−11.70, −6.67
Body composition
 Fat mass (per 5 kg) 1.12 (0.07, 2.18) −2.15 (−2.71, −1.58)
 Fat percentage (per 5%) 1.64 (0.15, 3.16) −2.70 (−3.50, −1.90)
Physical activity (per 20 MET h/week) −1.00 (−1.76, −0.23) 0.64 (0.21, 1.09)

n = 3,631 except for waist circumference (n = 3,630), waist-to-hip ratio (n = 3,629), body composition (n = 3,619), and physical activity (n = 3,620). Boldface indicates significant result.

a

Adjusted for age (continuous), sex (male, female), future CHD case status (whether participant developed CHD during 10 year follow-up), and HDL with or without apoC-III concentration, respectively.