Skip to main content
. 2016;17(10):4555–4561. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.10.4555

Table 2.

Demographic Characteristics of Participants in Study

Group Variable Intervention groups Number (%) Control group Number (%) Probability P-value
Residence location
 Kerman 25 (100%) 18 (72%) 0.005
 Kerman suburbs 0 (0%) 7.0 (28%)
Marital status
 Single 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 0.5
 Married 20 (80%) 18 (72%)
 Divorced 0.0 (0.0%) 1.0 (4.0%)
 Widow 5.0 (20.0%) 4.0 (16.0%)
Education
 Literate 3 (12%) 7 (28%) 0.1
 Elementary school 7 (28%) 5 (20%)
 Middle school 6 (24%) 1 (4%)
 High school and above 9 (36%) 12 (48%)
Insurance status
 Health service 12 (48%) 10 (40%) 0.9
 Rural services 0 (0%) 1 (4%)
Social security 11 (44%) 11 (44%)
 Armed forces 1 (4%) 2 (8%)
 Steel industry 1 (4%) 0 (0%)
 Supplementary 0 (0%) 1 (4%)
Employment status
 Employee 2 (8%) 6 (24%) 0.3
 Retired 3 (12%) 2 (8%)
 Disabled 0 (0%) 1 (24%)
 Self-employed 1 (4%) 0.0 (0.0%)
 Housewife 19 (76%) 16.0 (64.0%)
Income
 Less than three-hundred USD[1] 19 (76%) 17 (68%) 0.2
 three-hundred USD 5(20%) 3 (12%)
 More than three-hundred USD 1 (4%) 5 (20%)
Other diseases
 Yes 3(12%) 5 (20%) 0.3
 No 22 (88%) 20 (80%)
Family member with the disease
 Yes 7 (28%) 7 (28%) 0.6
 No 18 (72%) 18 (72%)
Training on breast cancer
 Yes 20 (80%) 4 (16%) <10-3
 No 5 (20%) 21 (84%)
Training on self-management
 Yes 6 (24%) 2 (8%) 0.1
 No 91 (76%) 23 (92%)