Skip to main content
. 2017;18(2):549–555. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.2.549

Table 2.

Results of Meta-Analysis for XRCC3 rs861539 Polymorphism and OSA Risk

Genetic model No. study Type of model Heterogeneity Odds ratio Publication Bias
I2 (%) PH OR 95% CI POR PBeggs PEggers
Pooled
T vs. C 2 Fixed 0 0.848 1.563 1.244-1.963 <0.001 NA NA
TC vs. CC 2 Fixed 0 0.971 1.361 0.982-1.885 0.064 NA NA
TT vs. CC 2 Fixed 0 0.917 2.574 1.573-4.212 <0.001 NA NA
TT+TC vs. CC 4 Fixed 58.12 0.067 1.255 1.011-1.558 0.039 0.308 0.529
TT vs. TC+CC 2 Fixed 0 0.909 2.224 1.393-3.552 0.001 NA NA
Caucasian
TT+TC vs. CC 1 Fixed 0 1 0.713 0.438-1.161 0.174 NA NA
Asian
TT+TC vs. CC 3 Fixed 0 0.697 1.442 1.133-1.835 0.003 1 0.612