Skip to main content
. 2017 May 2;18(5):958. doi: 10.3390/ijms18050958

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Figure 6

The abundance of the protein species of each REF/SRPP in high yielding and lower yielding clones of rubber tree upon ethylene treatment. (A) Clustering analysis of the relative abundance of the total protein and its protein species of each REF/SRPP after tapping and ethylene treatment. The abundance of each protein species in different treatments was normalized to their corresponding values in the control, CK; (B) Clustering analysis of the relative abundance of the total protein and the protein species of each REF/SRPP in rubber tree clones RY 7-33-97, PR 107 and RY 8-79. The abundance values of each protein or protein species were normalized to their corresponding values in RY 7-33-97; (C) 2-DE gel images of the protein species of REF175 and REF258 in rubber clones RY 7-33-97, PR 107 and RY 8-79. CK, the latex collected from the first tapping. D24h, D48h, D96h, latex from rubber trees at 24, 48, and 96 h under distilled water treatment. E24h, E48h, E96h, latex from rubber trees at 24, 48, and 96 h the under 3% ethephon treatment.