Table 2.

Frequency Effect Sizes of emergent themes by informant group

	Combined (n = 31)		Academic (n = 13)		Government (n = 6)		Industry (n = 3)		Organization (n = 9)
Theme	FES	pR	FES	pR	FES	pR	FES	pR	FES	pR
Capability
Broadband	16%	25	15%	30	0%	13	0%	23	33%	52
Change	39%	70	38%	73	33%	58	0%	23	56%	75
Credibility	71%	100	69%	100	67%	95	67%	80	78%	95
Cyber	39%	70	31%	60	17%	38	33%	55	67%	88
Engagement	6%	5	8%	12	0%	13	0%	23	11%	18
Insecurity	26%	45	31%	60	17%	38	67%	80	11%	18
Interference	16%	25	23%	47	0%	13	0%	23	22%	33
Knowledge	58%	90	54%	87	50%	77	100%	98	56%	75
Literacy	16%	25	8%	12	0%	13	33%	55	56%	75
Marketing	6%	5	8%	12	17%	38	0%	23	0%	7
Product	10%	10	23%	47	0%	13	0%	23	0%	7
Workflow	42%	82	31%	60	67%	95	67%	80	33%	52
Motivation
Big Data	23%	40	8%	12	17%	38	0%	23	56%	75
Blended Care	39%	70	62%	93	33%	58	0%	23	22%	33
Cost/Benefit	32%	52	38%	73	17%	38	33%	55	33%	52
Empowerment	58%	90	46%	83	50%	77	100%	98	67%	88
EMR	42%	82	38%	73	50%	77	67%	80	33%	52
Unreached	35%	58	38%	73	33%	58	0%	23	44%	63
Wait Times	26%	45	23%	47	33%	58	0%	23	33%	52
Opportunity
Alignment	32%	52	23%	47	67%	95	67%	80	11%	18
Endorsement	13%	15	8%	12	50%	77	0%	23	0%	7
Funding	68%	97	62%	93	50%	77	67%	80	89%	100
Incentives	19%	35	15%	30	17%	38	33%	55	22%	33
Infrastructure	35%	58	15%	30	50%	77	33%	55	56%	75
Licensing	16%	25	23%	47	0%	13	0%	23	22%	33
Mandate	19%	35	8%	12	17%	38	33%	55	33%	52
Networks	58%	90	38%	73	67%	95	67%	80	78%	95
Partnership	39%	70	15%	30	50%	77	67%	80	56%	75
Patient Cost	13%	15	15%	30	0%	13	0%	23	22%	33
Reimburse	39%	70	62%	93	17%	38	67%	80	11%	18

Percentages were rounded up to whole numbers

EMR Electronic Medical Record, FES Frequency Effect Size (expressed as %), pR Percentile Rank (expressed as rank out of 100^th percentile)