Table 3.
Intensity Effect Sizes of emergent themes from informant interviews
| Combined (n = 310) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Theme | IES | pR |
| Capability | ||
| Broadband | 2% | 25 |
| Change | 6% | 80 |
| Credibility | 11% | 97 |
| Cyber | 5% | 72 |
| Engagement | 1% | 7 |
| Insecurity | 3% | 33 |
| Interference | 2% | 20 |
| Knowledge | 10% | 93 |
| Literacy | 2% | 30 |
| Marketing | 1% | 3 |
| Product | 1% | 13 |
| Workflow | 4% | 55 |
| Motivation | ||
| Big Data | 3% | 42 |
| Blended Care | 6% | 80 |
| Cost/Benefit | 3% | 50 |
| Empowerment | 8% | 90 |
| EMR | 5% | 72 |
| Unreached | 5% | 62 |
| Wait Times | 3% | 42 |
| Opportunity | ||
| Alignment | 5% | 67 |
| Endorsement | 1% | 13 |
| Funding | 13% | 100 |
| Incentives | 3% | 42 |
| Infrastructure | 5% | 62 |
| Licensing | 2% | 25 |
| Mandate | 3% | 42 |
| Networks | 6% | 80 |
| Partnership | 4% | 55 |
| Patient Cost | 1% | 13 |
| Reimburse | 6% | 87 |
Percentages were rounded up to whole numbers
EMR Electronic Medical Record, IES Intensity Effect Size (expressed as %), pR Percentile Rank (expressed as rank out of 100th percentile)