Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 24;8(8):5537–5553. doi: 10.3390/ma8085261

Table 4.

Comparison of the test results with previous studies on UHPC.

Study Variables Shape and Size of Specimen (mm) Specified Compressive Strength (MPa) Water-to-Binder Ratio/Mineral Admixture (% of Binder) Early-Age Strength Development (Curing Condition)
This study Curing temperature, delay time, continuing time, moisture condition Cylinder (Φ 100 × 200) 180 0.2/Silica fume (20%) 180 MPa in 7 days (40 °C for 4 days or 60 °C for 2 days in moist condition)
SAMARIS [1] - Cylinder (Φ 110 × 220) 180 0.123/Silica fume (21%) 150 MPa in 7 days (20 °C for 7 days in moist condition)
Ishii et al. [5] Curing temperature Not specified 180 Not specified 147 MPa in 4 days (70 °C for 2 days)
Matsubara et al. [6] Curing temperature Cylinder (Φ 100 × 200) 180 0.152/Silica fume (not specified) 180 MPa in 7 days (40 °C or 60 °C for 7 days)
Ahlborn et al. [14] Curing temperature, delay time Cylinder (Φ 76 × 152) 200 Not specified 137 MPa in 7 days (20 °C for 7 days)
Nakayama et al. [16] Curing temperature, delay time, continuing time Cylinder (Φ 100 × 200) 150 0.15/Silica fume (15%) 135 MPa in 7 days (60 °C for 3 h in moist condition)
Honma et al. [17] Curing temperature Cylinder (Φ 100 × 200) 150–200 0.12–0.2/Silica fume (10%–20%) 90–100 MPa in 7 days (20 °C for 7 days in moist condition) and
130–170 MPa in 7 days (40 °C for 7 days in moist condition)