Table 2.
Review and comparison of characteristics of previously published automated sleep-scoring approaches using invasive electrodes.
| Authors | Year | Type of analysis | Species | User-user | Auto-visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| van Luijtelaar et al.,36 | 1984 | Computer based automated spectral analysis | Rat | 93% | 93.6% |
| Mamelak et al.,21 | 1988 | Period-amplitude analysis using artificial neural networks (ANN) | Cat | N/A | 90% |
| Benington et al.,3 | 1994 | Computer based algorithm based on thresholding The amount of delta, theta and sigma power. | Rat | N/A | ~91% |
| Crisler et al.,8 | 2008 | 107 frequency and time parameters were extracted from ECOG and EMG to train support vector machine (SVM) | Rat | 86.3% | 96% |
| Kohtoh et al.,15 | 2008 | Fast Fourier transform power spectrum analysis | Rat | N/A | 90% |
| Stephenso n et al.,34 | 2009 | Automated system (ratSAS) to reject artifacts and differentiate sleep states | Rat | N/A | Wake=92% NREM 88% REM 80%. |
| Rytkonen et al.,26 | 2011 | Open source MATLAB algorithm using naive Bayes classifier | Rats and mice | 88–92% | 98% |