Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178646

Table 4. Lateral mobility of plasma membrane-bound GFP-tagged wildtype and mutant stomatin.

Correlation of mobile fractions and recovery halftimes with the ability to oligomerize and/or associate with DRMs.

Stomatin mutant a Mobile fraction (MF) Recovery halftime (t1/2) Oligo DRM
Mean (%) SE ΔMF (%) p-value Mean [s] SE Δt1/2 [s] p-value
ΔC 88.6 5.1 + 30.0 0.0001 17.4 5.1 - 9.3 0.1315 - -
Arg62Ala 77.4 2.7 + 18.8 0.0122 28.5 2.1 + 1.8 0.2231 - -
Pro245Ala 78.0 2.7 + 19.4 0.0082 34.5 2.4 + 7.8 0.6089 - (+)
ΔCC 69.6 1.5 + 11.0 0.1378 29.1 3.5 + 2.4 0.4417 - +
Pro200Ala 68.6 2.1 + 10.0 0.2650 32.3 2.1 + 5.6 0.2231 - +
Cys30Ser 66.8 2.1 + 8.2 0.4877 29.3 2.4 + 2.6 0.2769 + +
ΔN 60.3 2.4 + 2.7 0.9560 44.5 8.3 + 17.8 0.2056 + +
WT 58.6 4.4 0.0 26.7 9.4 0.0 + +

a Mutants are listed roughly according to decreasing mobile fractions. MF, mobile fraction; t1/2, recovery halftime; ΔMF, MF-change of mutant versus WT; Δt1/2, t1/2-change of mutant versus WT; SE, standard error; ΔC, C-terminal deletion; ΔCC, coiled-coil deletion; ΔN, N-terminal deletion; WT, wildtype; Oligo, oligomerization; DRM, DRM-association; +, positive; (+), slightly positive (≈30% of WT); -, negative; ─, not applicable. Mean values, standard errors (SE), differences between mutants and WT values (ΔMF, Δt1/2), and p-values are given. Number of measurements for each value: n ≥ 20. The p-values indicate the significance of the differences between values of mutants and WT.