Skip to main content
. 2017 May 24;4(2):109–117. doi: 10.1007/s40801-017-0109-6

Table 4.

Mean change in QUARTIS scores during the first year of SLIT with five-grass pollen tablet (n = 253)

QUARTIS domain Range of scorea (min–max) Q1 score (mean ± SD) before SLIT Q2 score (mean ± SD) during SLIT Change in score (mean ± SD) until end of SLIT p valueb
Nasal symptoms 4–20 14.0 ± 3.7 10.2 ± 4.1 −3.8 ± 4.3 <0.0001
Ocular symptoms 2–10 6.4 ± 2.5 4.4 ± 2.2 −2.0 ± 2.8 <0.0001
Allergy in everyday life 3–15 9.8 ± 3.1 7.3 ± 3.2 −2.5 ± 3.6 <0.0001
Ease of SLIT intake 2–8 2.5 ± 1.0 2.3 ± 0.7 −0.2 ± 1.0 0.0067
Disadvantages of SLIT 5–25 8.7 ± 3.5 7.9 ± 2.8 −0.8 ± 2.9 <0.0001

A decrease in nasal symptoms, ocular symptoms, allergy in everyday life, ease of SLIT intake, or disadvantages of SLIT represents a favourable result

Q questionnaire, QUARTIS Questionnaire sur l’Allergie Respiratoire Traitée par Immunothérapie Sublinguale, SD standard deviation, SLIT sublingual immunotherapy

aSum of the ratings of all items in the domain

bWilcoxon test within the subgroup of patients who filled in the QUARTIS questionnaire before the start of SLIT and at least once thereafter