Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2017 Mar 29;18(6):605–614. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.007

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study N Age in years Mean (range) Sex Female/Male Surgery type
Carreon et al.2 887 14.3 (10–18) 735/152 Spinal fusion
Connelly et al.4 50 14.5 (11–17) 41/9 Posterior spinal fusion
Landman et al.11 295 NR (8–22)* NR* Spinal fusion
Lillehei et al.12 44 14.7 (10–18.8) 28/16 Ilioanal pull through
Lind et al.13 20 12.5 (8–16) 11/9 Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (knee)
Mariconda et al.14 87 14.8 (11–22) 77/10 Spinal fusion
Nishimura et al.15 12 14.4 (12–17) 0/12 Osteochondral transplant (donor knee evaluated)
Page et al.17,18 83 13.8 (8–18) 56/27 Major orthopedic and general surgery
Pellegrino et al.20 33 15.6 (11–20) 31/2 Posterior spinal fusion
Rabbitts et al.22 60 14.7 (10–18) 40/20 Major orthopedic and general surgery
Sieberg et al.23 190 14.4 (8–21) 137/53 Spinal fusion
Stromqvist et al.24 74 17** (12–17) 43/31 Surgery for lumbar disk herniation
*

Demographics only provided for full sample of 1433 patients and not for 295 included in the analyses

**

Median age reported