Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2017 Apr 11;36(14):2163–2186. doi: 10.1002/sim.7257

Table 3.

Correlation Estimates for the RP Data Set (220 patients, 440 eyes)*

Crude Adjusted

Type of correlation Parameter Point estimate 95% CI P-value Neyes (Neyes,obs**) Point estimate 95% CI P-value Neyes (Neyes,obs**)
Pearson ρxy 0.212 (0.088, 0.329) <0.001 440 (433) 0.195 (0.071, 0.312) 0.002 440 (433)
ρxy
0.177 (0.054, 0.295) 0.004 440 (433) 0.156 (0.033, 0.274) 0.012 440 (433)
ρxx 0.787 0.766
σx2
100.2 91.1
ρyy 0.944 0.943
σy2
227, 330 201, 710
Rank ρxy,s 0.229 (0.110, 0.341) <0.001 440 (433) 0.221 (0.103, 0.333) <0.001 440 (433)
ρxy,s
0.200 (0.082, 0.312) <0.001 440 (433) 0.189 (0.072, 0.301) 0.001 440 (433)
ρxx,s 0.819 0.807
σx,s2
0.946 0.891
ρyy,s 0.909 0.900
σy,s2
0.962 0.884
*

VA is available for 219 patients for the right eye (OD) and 216 patients for the left eye (OS); VF is available for 217 patients for the right eye (OD) and 216 patients for the left eye (OS); age, gender and genetic type are available for all 220 patients; missing data are accounted for using multiple imputation.

**

Neyes,obs = number of eyes where both VA and VF are observed; Neyes = number of eyes observed + number of eyes imputed for the characteristic

computer run:
  • :/proj/stross/stros0a/rankcorrelation/correlation.ranked.proc.mi3a.sas 11/23/15
  • :/proj.stross/stros0a/rankcorrelation/correlation.ranked.proc.mi.residual.probit.sas 12/04/15
  • :/proj/stross/stros0a/rankcorrelation/correlation.ranked.proc.mi.residual.sas 12/04/15