Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 2;13:32. doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0160-0

Table 6.

Characteristics of the 10 communities in the Amazon of Peru and Bolivia where 483 interviews about Euterpe precatoria and E. oleracea uses were gathered

N° Comunity Community (Population) Ethnic group Accessibility(a) Social services available(b) Number of informants
Nearest town (Population) Type of access (Distance in hr.) Electricity Education Healthcare 483
Peru
 1 San Martín (500) Cocama Iquitos (450,000) Fluvial / Road (19) 3 2 3 87
 2 El Chino (550) Mestizo Iquitos (450,000) Fluvial (10) 1 1 2 79
 3 Santa Ana (450) Mestizo Iquitos (450,000) Fluvial (5) 2 2 1 89
 4 Yamayakat (1000) Aguaruna Bagua (74,000) Fluvial / Road (3) 3 1 3 36
 5 Cusu Chico (150) Aguaruna Bagua (74,000) Fluvial / Road (3.5) 3 1 3 13
 6 Nueva Samaria (80) Aguaruna Bagua (74,000) Fluvial / Road (3.25) 1 1 1 20
Bolivia
 7 Santa María (250) Mestizo Riberalta (90,000) Loose surface road (1) 3 1 3 41
 8 26 de Octubre (180) Mestizo Riberalta (90,000) Road (1) 1 1 2 38
 9 Alto Ivón (500) Chácobo Riberalta (90,000) Road (4) 1 2 3 56
 10 Motacuzal (30) Chácobo Riberalta (90,000) Road (3.5) 1 1 2 24

(a)The information about the nearest town and the time to reach it were obtained from the interviews. The data represents the town and the time most frequently reported by the informants; (b)Availability of electricity: (1) no electricity, (2) free electricity, (3) paid electricity. Access to education: (1) primary school, (2) secondary school. Access to healthcare: (1) without health post (only traditional medicine), (2) health post / community nurse, (3) health post / physician