Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 12;6(4):e18. doi: 10.1038/emi.2017.4

Table 1. Seropositivity of R. conorii and R. felis with respect to different category of the participants investigated in this study.

Categories R. conorii
R. felis
  Number (%) P-value 95% CI Number (%) P-value 95% CI
Study group
 Blood donors (n=61) 2 (3.3)a <0.001 0.0%–7.9% 0 (0.0)a <0.001 0.0%–0.0%
 Farm workers (n=87) 12 (13.8)a   6.4%–21.2% 14 (16.1)   8.2%–24.0%
 Indigenous people (n=102) 51 (50.0)   40.1%–59.9% 23 (22.5)   14.3%–30.8%
 
Gender
 Male (n=143) 31 (21.7) 0.072 14.8%–28.5% 23 (16.1) 0.509 10.0%–22.2%
 Female (n=107) 34 (31.8)   22.8%–40.7% 14 (13.1)   6.6%–19.6%
 
Age group (years)
 ≤20 (n=37) 10 (27.0) 0.011 12.0%–42.0% 2 (5.4)b 0.001 0.0%–13.0%
 21–30 (n=75) 19 (25.3)   15.3%–35.4% 11 (14.7)   6.5%–22.9%
 31–40 (n=60) 16 (26.7)   15.1%–38.2% 3 (5.0)b   0.0%–10.7%
 41–50 (n=39) 3 (7.7)b   0.0%–16.4% 8 (20.5)   7.3%–33.8%
 ≥51 (n=39) 17 (43.6)   27.3%–59.9% 13 (33.3)   17.9%–48.8%

Abbreviation: confidence interval, CI.

a

Significant difference in the rickettsial-seropositivity rate when compared to the indigenous people (Games–Howell post hoc test).

b

Significant difference in the rickettsial-seropositivity rate when compared to those ≥51 years of age (Games–Howell post hoc test).