Table 1.
Social exclusion studies meeting inclusionary criteria
| Study | N (M) | Age | Task | Design | N (foci) | Developmental sub-analyses | Design sub-analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beeney et al., 2011 | 20 (10) | 24.6 (5.8), 18 – 35 | Others-Cyberball | Block | 9 | ||
| Bolling et al., 2011a | 21 (15) | 12.90 (2.59), 7–18 | Cyberball | Block | 10 | Developmental | Alternating |
| Bolling et al., 2011c | 33 (11) | 24.0 (3.81) | Cyberball | Block | 12 | Emerging adult | Alternating |
| Bolling et al., 2012 | 20 (11) | 24.99 (3.91) | Cyberball | Block | 12 | Emerging adult | Alternating |
| Bolling et al., 2015a | 15 (9) | 11.88 (3.2), 7–18 | Cyberball | Block | 12 | Developmental | Alternating |
| Bolling et al., 2015b | 20 (10) | 12.61(2.5), 7–17 | Cyberball | Block | 12 | Developmental | Alternating |
| Bonenberger et al., 2015 | 31 (0) | 22.2 (3.38) | Cyberball | Block | 8 | Emerging adult | Traditional |
| DeWall et al., 2012 | 25 (9) | Undergraduate | Cyberball | Block | 15 | Emerging adult | Traditional |
| Domsalla et al., 2014 | 40 (0) | 1: 28.7 (7.8) 2: 29.2 (7.5) |
Cyberball | Block | 12 | Emerging adult | Alternating |
| Eisenberger et al., 2003 | 13 (4) | Undergraduate | Cyberball | Block | 4 | Emerging adult | Traditional |
| Falk et al., 2014 | 36 (36) | 16.8 (0.47), 16–17 | Cyberball | Block | 6 | Developmental | Traditional |
| Gonzalez et al., 2015 | 85 (40) | 24.5 (1.35) | Cyberball | Block | 6 | Emerging adult | Traditional |
| Gradin et al., 2012 | 16 (7) | 40.87 (11.72) | Cyberball | Block | 3 | Alternating | |
| Gunther Moor et al., 2010 | 57 (27) | 1: 9.7 (0.9), 8–10 2: 13.3 (0.8), 12–14 3: 17.1 (0.6), 16–17 4: 21.7 (1.9), 19–25 |
Social Judgment | Event | 0 | ||
| Gunther Moor et al., 2012 | 53 (22) | 1: 11.8(0.87), 10–12 2: 15.74(0.74), 14–16 3: 20.38(0.8), 19–21 |
Cyberball | Events | 9 | Traditional (events) | |
| Guyer et al., 2012 | 36 (20) | 13.54 (2.5), 9–18 | Chatroom | Event | 0 | ||
| Gyurak et al., 2012 | 33 (12) | 20.61 (1.77) | Viewing paintings | Block | 4 | ||
| Karremans et al., 2011 | 15 (5) | 22 (19–33) | Cyberball | Block | 13 | Emerging adult | Traditional |
| Kawamoto et al., 2012 | 22 (3) | 20.7 (1.7), 18–24 | Cyberball | Events | 12 | Emerging adult | Alternating (events) |
| Lee et al., 2014 | 16 (9) | 27.4 (6.9) | Virtual handshake | Event | 3 | ||
| Masten et al., 2009 | 23 (9) | 13.0, 12.4–13.6 | Cyberball | Block | 4 | Developmental | Traditional |
| Masten et al., 2011a | 17 (15) | 13.6 (2.5) | Cyberball | Block | 19 | Developmental | Traditional |
| Masten et al., 2011d | 18 (9) | 21.4 (19–28) | Cyberball | Block | 15 | Emerging adult | Traditional |
| Masten et al., 2011c | 16 (7) | 19.88, 18–24 | Others-Cyberball | Block | 5 | ||
| Masten et al., 2012 | 21 (7) | 17.77 (0.43) | Cyberball | Block | 25 | Developmental | |
| Meyer et al., 2013 | 16 (12) | 21.69 (2.12) | Others-Cyberball | Block | 7 | ||
| Nishiyama et al., 2015 | 46 (17) | 19.85 (no range) | Cyberball | Block | 14 | Emerging adult | |
| Novembre et al., 2015 | 23 (0) | 22.4 (2.0), 20–28 | Cyberball | Block | 13 | Emerging adult | |
| Onoda et al., 2009 | 26 (11) | 21.79 (1.3), 20–25 | Cyberball | Block | 2 | Emerging adult | |
| Preller et al., 2016 | 21 (12) | 26.48 (4.76) | Cyberball | Events | 27 | Emerging adult | Traditional (events) |
| Puetz et al., 2014 | 51 (25) | 1: 10.6 (1.75) 2: 10.38 (1.7) |
Cyberball | Block | 2 | Developmental | Traditional |
| Premkumar et al., 2012 | 26 (5) | 1: 30 (10.58) 2: 28.64 (6.07) |
Viewing IAPS pictures | Block | 9 | ||
| Sebastian et al., 2010a | 19 (0) | 14 – 28 | Rejection Stroop | Block | 8 | ||
| Sebastian et al., 2011 | 35 (0) | 1: 15.44 (0.81, 14–17 2: 28.70 (3.91), 24–39 |
Cyberball | Block | 12 | Alternating | |
| Silk et al., 2014 | 48 (14) | 15.48 (1.68), 11–17 | Chatroom | Event | 0 | ||
| Van Harmelen et al., 2014 | 46 (12) | 1: 18.31 (1.23) 2: 18.85 (1.90) |
Cyberball | Events | 8 | Emerging adult | Traditional (events) |
| Via et al., 2015 | 20 (0) | 28.15 (8.62) | Social Judgment | Block | 12 | ||
| Will et al., 2015 | 28 (12) | 20.7 (1.97) | Cyberball | Events | 13 | Emerging adult | Traditional (events) |
| Will et al., 2016 | 44 (26) | 14.0 (0.70) | Cyberball | Events | 5 | Developmental | Traditional (events) |
| Wudarczyk et al., 2015 | 24 (14) | 24.33 (2.91), 18–29 | Cyberball | Block | 3 | Emerging adult |
Note: N (M) = total sample size (number of males). “Others-Cyberball” involved participants watching others/peers playing Cyberball. Design sub-analyses all represent block designs unless noted otherwise (i.e. as event-related).