Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 20;17(3):184–191. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000382

Summary of Recommendations.

What we know
  • Many governmental agencies, professional associations, and other groups have released neonatal pain management guidelines.

  • The release of a guideline does not ensure that evidence-based care will be adopted in the neonatal intensive care unit setting.

  • The monitoring of quality indicators provides a measure for the adoption of standards of care and is an effective method for improving the quality of practice.

  • Projects employing a multihospital collaborative quality improvement model have shown greater effectiveness than single-site projects.

What needs to be studied
  • The development of a neonatal pain quality improvement collaborative program based on the current standards of care for pain management in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Japan

  • The use of pain management quality indicators to evaluate NICU quality improvement collaborative programs

  • Determination of whether neonatal pain improvement collaborative programs enhance local quality improvement efforts in Japan

What we can do today
  • Introduce electronic medical record pain management forms based on practice standards to support standardized assessment and documentation as well as individualized care planning

  • Use pain management quality indicators to track the progress of quality improvement efforts and motivate staff

  • Provide education, structure, and feedback to support tests of change