Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 2;31(10):1451–1460. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001502

Table 1.

Acquisition rates, and univariable and multivariable Cox regression model results for time to partnership acquisition (N = 587).

Variable Eventsa,b (N = 161) Person-years at risk Rate per 100 person-years) (95% CI) Unadj. HRc CI Adjusted HRd CI Wald P value
ART group
 Pre-ART 62 597.51 10.38 (7.96, 13.30) 1.00 1.00
 ART-eligible 99 947.15 10.45 (8.50, 12.73) 1.07 (0.76, 1.49) 0.97 (0.70, 1.35) 0.87
Sex
 Female 120 1138.67 10.54 (8.74, 12.60) 1.00 1.00
 Male 41 405.98 10.10 (7.25, 13.70) 0.96 (0.64, 1.42) 0.62 (0.41, 0.94) 0.025
Age (years)
 18–21 18 64.15 28.06 (16.63, 44.35) 1.89 (1.18, 3.02) 1.96 (1.25, 3.06) <0.001
 22–29 61 387.46 15.74 (12.04, 20.22) 1.00 1.00
 30–39 60 573.60 10.46 (7.98, 13.46) 0.73 (0.51, 1.04) 0.71 (0.50, 1.01)
 40+ 22 519.45 4.24 (2.65, 6.41) 0.28 (0.16, 0.50) 0.21 (0.12, 0.36)
Partner status at enrolment
 Ongoing partnere 100 1156.55 8.65 (7.04, 10.52) 1.00 1.00
 No partner 61 388.11 15.72 (12.02, 20.19) 1.81 (1.29, 2.52) 2.50 (1.84, 3.40) <0.001
Has previously disclosed HIV status to anyone
 No 25 185.13 13.50 (8.74, 19.93) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 136 1359.53 10.00 (8.39, 11.83) 0.74 (0.45, 1.20) 0.58 (0.37, 0.89) 0.014
Ever used alcohol
 No 63 820.91 7.67 (5.90, 9.82)
 Yes 98 723.74 13.54 (10.99, 16.50) 1.76 (1.27, 2.45) 1.70 (1.18, 2.44) 0.004
No. of lifetime partnersf
 ≤3 75 907.40 8.27 (6.50, 10.36) 1.00 1.00
 >3 81 600.64 13.49 (10.71, 16.76) 1.63 (1.18, 2.26) 1.81 (1.27, 2.58) 0.001

ART, antiretroviral therapy; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

aIn a few instances, participants reported getting back together during follow-up with the person they had reported as their most recent but not ongoing partnership at enrolment. A few other participants reported a new partner but they never became sexually active with them. These were not considered new acquisitions in the analysis.

bTwenty-four partnerships were concurrent, that is, reported to have started while the participant was in at least one other ongoing partnership.

cNo other variables were significant in univariable models.

dThe final model did not violate the proportional hazards assumption, global test P = 0.09. Fitting a model with Gaussian individual frailties, the estimated variance was not found significantly different from zero (P value = 0.92), suggesting very little variation between individuals.

eThere were two groups of participants with ongoing partners at baseline, those who were recently sexually active and those who were abstaining from sex with their partners for various reasons. The number of new acquisitions, acquisition rates and 95% CIs for these two groups were: 90/1054.3 = 8.54 (6.86, 10.5) and 10/102.25 = 9.78 (4.69, 17.99) respectively and were not statistically different from each other.

fMissing values for 15 participants.