Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2016 Dec 4;78(5):1746–1756. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26565

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Phantom study to assess the accuracy of T1 estimation by four fitting algorithms BLESSPC (a), InSiL (b), IG fit (c), and Original fit (d) in groups I-III. An inversion factor of 0.96 was used for all approaches. Phantom reference T1 values were obtained using standard inversion recovery spin echo and shown in bottom panel. The BLESSPC fitting, InSiL fitting, IG fit and the original fit were applied to the MOLLI sequence. Overall, BLESSPC and InSiL generated more accurate T1 values when compared to IG fit and original fit and were less sensitive to flip angle, heart rate, and acquisition scheme variations.