Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2016 Dec 4;78(5):1746–1756. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26565

Table 1.

Myocardial T1 values at selected ROI (LV inter-septal region) in 8 healthy volunteers measured by the MOLLI sequence using four different T1 estimations algorithms.

MOLLI Myocardium BLESSPC InSiL IG fit4 Original fit4
5(3)3, 35° T1 (ms) 1167.9±23.1 1165.5±22.9 1092.7±24.2 1095.9±22.4
5(0)3, 35° T1 (ms) 1166.2±34.8 1165.2±34.8 1089.9±31.1 1000.4±31.6*
Difference 1 (−0.2%±1.8%) (−0.0%±1.8%) (−0.3%±1.2%) (−8.7%±1.7%)
4(1)3(1)2, 35° T1 (ms) 1161.6±23.7 1157.9±23.3 1090.1±22.4 1039.3±26.5*
Difference 1 (−0.5%±1.2%) (−0.6%±1.2%) (−0.2%±1.9%) (−5.2%±2.0%)
5(3)3, 20° T1 (ms) 1150.8±26.9* 1145.0±27.0* 1123.0±31.3* 1117.1±26.1*
Difference 1 (−1.5%±1.3%) (−1.8%±1.3%) (2.8%±1.3%) (1.9%±0.7%)
5(3)3, 50° T1 (ms) 1174.5±27.7 1177.3±29.2 1052.6±23.9* 1059.2±25.6*
Difference 1 (0.6%±1.1%) (1.0%±1.3%) (−3.7%±0.9%) (−3.4%±0.9%)
CoV of 3 schemes 2 0.9%±0.5%d 1.0%±0.5%d 1.0%±0.7% d 4.7%±1.0%abc
CoV of 3 FAs 3 1.2%±0.6%bcd 1.6%±0.6%acd 3.3%±0.6%ab 2.7%±0.3%ab
1

Mean myocardial T1 fractional difference compared to the standard MOLLI 5(3)3, FA=35° acquisition.

2

the 3 schemes include 5(3)3, 5(0)3 and 4(1)3(1)2;

3

the 3 flip angles (FAs) include FA=20°, 35° and 50° using the 5(3)3 acquisition scheme;

4

For a fair comparison with BLESSPC and InSiL T1 values, the reported T1 values for IG fit and original fit were T1 values after inversion factor correction, which is T1corrected = T1/δ, and δ=0.88.

*

indicate significant T1 estimation difference compared to the standard MOLLI 5(3)3, FA=35° acquisition (p<0.05),

a

indicate significant difference compared to BLESSPC (p<0.008),

b

indicate significant difference compared to InSiL (p<0.008),

c

indicate significant difference compared to IG fit (p<0.008),

d

indicate significant difference compared to original fit (p<0.008).