Skip to main content
. 2017 May 18;2017(5):CD003650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003650.pub4

Cárcamo 2006 PER.

Methods Country: Peru
Setting: tertiary hospitals
Duration of recruitment: June 1998 to Jan 2000
Duration of follow‐up: 2 weeks
Design: randomized placebo‐controlled trial
Participants Inclusion criteria:
HIV‐seropositive, persistent diarrhoea (≥ 7 days) without prior treatment
Exclusion criteria: none stated
Participants randomized: 159
49 female and 110 male
Median age = 30 years (range 19 to 57) in zinc group
Median age = 31 years (range 19 to 64) in placebo group
Loss to follow‐up/withdrawal: 51
Exclusions postrandomization: 0
Interventions Intervention: zinc sulphate (100 mg)
Control: placebo
Duration: daily for 14 days
Outcomes Primary outcomes
  • Persistence of diarrhoea

  • Time until cessation of diarrhoea


Secondary outcomes:
  • Plasma zinc and copper levels

Adverse events Gastrointestinal symptoms attributable to the medication (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain) similar in both treatment groups
Notes Sulfamethoxazole‐trimethoprim prescribed for participants with enteric bacterial pathogens (23 in zinc group and 12 in placebo)
Source of funding: Fogarty IARTP grant; University of Washington Center for AIDS Research; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk The trial authors used computer‐generated blocked randomization.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk The trial authors stated that the treatment allocators were unable to access the assignment roll.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants and investigators were blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk There were high losses to follow‐up in both groups (34.6% intervention group versus 29.5% control group).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk There was insufficient information; the trial protocol was unavailable.
Other bias Unclear risk The trial authors did not declare on conflict of interest, if any.