Abdoel 2007.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Prospective multi‐centre study Healthcare setting: primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare centres Point of recruitment: inpatients and outpatients |
||
Patient characteristics and setting | Countries: Indonesia Level of typhoid endemicity (Crump 2004): high Age: both adults and children Gender distribution: not stated Entry criteria: clinical suspicion of typhoid Sample size: 425 |
||
Index tests | Name: latex agglutination assay, Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Netherlands Biological sample: venous blood |
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Target condition: Salmonella Typhi Reference standard: peripheral blood culture |
||
Flow and timing | Retrospective analysis. Index tests performed on stored serum samples. Time interval not stated. | ||
Comparative | |||
Notes | The study authors report that two raters evaluated the reproducibility of 123 of the index tests. | ||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | Yes | ||
Was a case‐control design avoided? | Yes | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Yes | ||
High | Low | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Unclear | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | Yes | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | No | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Unclear | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Yes | ||
Low |