Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;2017(5):CD008892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008892.pub2

Gasem 2002.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Prospective multicentre study
Healthcare setting: secondary (3) and tertiary (1)
Point of recruitment: inpatient
Patient characteristics and setting Countries: Indonesia
Level of typhoid endemicity (Crump 2004): high
Age: not stated
Gender distribution: not stated
Entry criteria: clinical suspicion of typhoid (127) and 80 febrile 'non‐typhoids'
Sample size: 207
Index tests Dipstick assay from the Royal Tropical Institute, Netherlands (KIT)
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: Salmonella Typhi
Reference standards: peripheral blood culture or bone marrow culture, or both
Flow and timing Prospective multi‐centre study. Timing unclear.
Comparative  
Notes Not all patients had both bone marrow culture and blood culture.
Study authors classified Isolation of Salmonella Paratyphi as a non‐typhoid case.
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear    
Was a case‐control design avoided? No    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes    
    High Low
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Yes    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Yes    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Yes    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? No    
    Low