House 2001.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Prospective multicentre study Healthcare setting: secondary and tertiary Point of recruitment: inpatients |
||
Patient characteristics and setting | Countries: Vietnam Level of typhoid endemicity (Crump 2004): high Age: adults and children Gender distribution: not specified Entry criteria: Salmonella Typhi on blood culture, and febrile controls, and healthy controls Sample size: 290 |
||
Index tests | TUBEX Dipstick Assay, Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Netherlands |
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Target condition: Salmonella Typhi Reference standard: peripheral blood culture |
||
Flow and timing | Prospective multicentre study. Timing unclear. | ||
Comparative | |||
Notes | Mostly children recruited. Sample size 290 but only 127 analysed. Case control design. | ||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | Yes | ||
Was a case‐control design avoided? | No | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Unclear | ||
High | Low | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Yes | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | No | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Unclear | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | No | ||
Low |