Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;2017(5):CD008892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008892.pub2

Ismail 2002.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Prospective multicentre study
Healthcare setting: tertiary (5 infectious diseases hospitals)
Point of recruitment: inpatients
Patient characteristics and setting Countries: Egypt
Level of typhoid endemicity (Crump 2004): medium
Age: not specified
Gender distribution: not specified
Entry criteria: febrile in‐patients meeting pre‐determined case definitions
Sample size: 85
Index tests Dipstick assay, Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Netherlands
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: Salmonella Typhi
Reference standard: peripheral blood culture
Flow and timing Prospective multicentre study. Samples tested retrospectively 2 to 3 months after recruitment.
Comparative  
Notes Part of a brucellosis diagnostic study.
Samples tested retrospectively 2 to 3 months later.
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? No    
Was a case‐control design avoided? No    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
    High Unclear
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Yes    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Yes    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? No    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Yes    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
    Low