Ley 2011.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Retrospective multi‐centre study Healthcare settings: secondary Point of recruitment: both inpatient and outpatient |
||
Patient characteristics and setting | Countries: Tanzania Level of typhoid endemicity (Crump 2004): medium Age: children between the ages of 2 months and 14 years Gender distribution: unclear Entry criteria: selected samples from a fever surveillance study Surveillance study entry criteria: fever > 3 days or those matching set clinical severity criteria |
||
Index tests | TUBEX | ||
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Target condition:Salmonella Typhi Reference standard(s): peripheral blood culture |
||
Flow and timing | Retrospective analysis on stored samples. Timing unclear. | ||
Comparative | |||
Notes | Only blood culture positive patients included. Samples from 2 different patient populations | ||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | No | ||
Was a case‐control design avoided? | No | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Yes | ||
High | Low | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Yes | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | No | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Unclear | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | No | ||
Low |