Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;2017(5):CD008892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008892.pub2

Prasad 2015.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Single centre retrospective analysis study
Healthcare setting: tertiary
Point of recruitment: both inpatients and outpatients
Patient characteristics and setting Countries: India
Level of typhoid endemicity (Crump 2004): high
Age: unclear
Gender distribution: unclear
Entry criteria: clinical suspicion of enteric fever
Index tests Typhidot‐M
Enteroscreen‐IgM
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: Salmonella Typhi
Reference standard(s): peripheral blood culture (volume not stated)
Flow and timing Retrospective analysis of stored samples. Timing unclear.
Comparative  
Notes Study authors classified Salmonella Paratyphi blood culture positive cases as disease‐negative.
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes    
Was a case‐control design avoided? No    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
    High Low
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Yes    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? No    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? No    
    Low