Table 1.
Factors and their levels in Schlam et al. 2016
| Cessation Interventions | Adherence Interventions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Condition | Medication Duration (8 vs. 26 weeks) | Maintenance Phone Counseling (Intensive vs. none) | Maintenance Medication Adherence Counseling (MMAC vs. none) | Automated Phone Adherence Counseling (Auto phone vs. none) | Electronic Monitoring Adherence Feedback (feedback vs. no feedback) |
| 1 | Extended | Intensive | MMAC | Auto phone | Feedback |
| 2 | Extended | Intensive | MMAC | Auto phone | No feedback |
| 3 | Extended | Intensive | MMAC | None | Feedback |
| 4 | Extended | Intensive | MMAC | None | No feedback |
| 5 | Extended | Intensive | None | Auto phone | Feedback |
| 6 | Extended | Intensive | None | Auto phone | No feedback |
| 7 | Extended | Intensive | None | None | Feedback |
| 8 | Extended | Intensive | None | None | No feedback |
| 9 | Extended | None | MMAC | Auto phone | Feedback |
| 10 | Extended | None | MMAC | Auto phone | No feedback |
| 11 | Extended | None | MMAC | None | Feedback |
| 12 | Extended | None | MMAC | None | No feedback |
| 13 | Extended | None | None | Auto phone | Feedback |
| 14 | Extended | None | None | Auto phone | No feedback |
| 15 | Extended | None | None | None | Feedback |
| 16 | Extended | None | None | None | No feedback |
| 17 | Standard | Intensive | MMAC | Auto phone | Feedback |
| 18 | Standard | Intensive | MMAC | Auto phone | No feedback |
| 19 | Standard | Intensive | MMAC | None | Feedback |
| 20 | Standard | Intensive | MMAC | None | No feedback |
| 21 | Standard | Intensive | None | Auto phone | Feedback |
| 22 | Standard | Intensive | None | Auto phone | No feedback |
| 23 | Standard | Intensive | None | None | Feedback |
| 24 | Standard | Intensive | None | None | No feedback |
| 25 | Standard | None | MMAC | Auto phone | Feedback |
| 26 | Standard | None | MMAC | Auto phone | No feedback |
| 27 | Standard | None | MMAC | None | Feedback |
| 28 | Standard | None | MMAC | None | No feedback |
| 29 | Standard | None | None | Auto phone | Feedback |
| 30 | Standard | None | None | Auto phone | No feedback |
| 31 | Standard | None | None | None | Feedback |
| 32 | Standard | None | None | None | No feedback |
Note. This table reflects the combinations of intervention components (conditions) that is generated by the crossing of two levels of five factors in a factorial design (Schlam et al. 2016). The table shows that the crossing of the five factors generates 32 unique combinations of intervention components; participants in the experiment were randomly assigned to one of these conditions so that approximately 1/32 of the N was assigned to each condition.