Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Metabolomics. 2016 Dec 12;13(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s11306-016-1149-8

Table 2.

Summary of the metabolomic profiling analyses of early pregnancy samples based on four profiling platforms

Analysis Metabolite features (n=8099)
Logistic regression modela n (%) significant features
p<0.05 484 (6.0%)
p<0.01 72 (0.9%)
p<0.001 2 (0.02%)
ROC analysisb AUC Model 1 (95% CI) 0.573 (0.463, 0.682)
AUC Model 2 (95% CI) 0.731 (0.624, 0.838)¥
AUC Model 3 (95% CI) 0.752 (0.658, 0.846)¥
AUC Model 4 (95% CI) 0.794 (0.700, 0.888)¥
a

Logistic regression model adjusting for maternal age and race, study site, and gestational age (wks)

b

Model1– mother’s age, race, site, and gestational age

Model2 – model1+ serum vitamin D at baseline (<30ng/ml or ≥30ng/ml)+ pre-pregnancy BMI

Model3 – model1+ Principal component1

Model4 – model1+ serum vitamin D at baseline (<30ng/ml or ge;30ng/ml) + pre-pregnancy BMI+ Principal component1

¥

Significantly (p<0.05) different to model 1

∞ Significantly (p<0.05) different to model 2

Ω Significantly (p<0.05) different to model 3

ROC; Receiver Operator Characteristic; AUC – Area Under the Curve; CI – Confidence Interval