Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 20;146(6):826–858. doi: 10.1037/xge0000301

Table 2. Results of Analyses Conducted at the End of Training That Assessed the Effect of Training Focus (O–P vs. O–S) on Accuracy and Response Times in Reading Aloud Versus Saying the Meanings of Trained Items, Reading Aloud Trained Versus Untrained Items, and Old-New Decisions to Trained Versus Untrained Items.

Task Main effect task Main effect focus Interaction
Reading aloud and saying the meaning of trained items
 Accuracy F(1, 23) < 1, ns F(1, 23) < 1 ns F(1, 23) = 7.35, p = .01, η2 = .24
 RT F(1, 23) = 60.88, p < .001, η2 = .73 F(1, 23) < 1, ns F(1, 23) = 31.10, p < .001, η2 = .58
Reading aloud trained and untrained items
 Accuracy F(1, 23) = 21.55, p < .001, η2 = .48 F(1, 23) = 1.57, ns F(1, 23) = 1.72, ns
 RT F(1, 23) = 57.31, p < .001, η2 = .71 F(1, 23) = 9.61, p < .01, η2 = .30 F(1, 23) < 1, ns
Old-new decisions to trained and untrained items
 D-Prime t(23) = 1.20, ns
 RT F(1, 23) = 66.23, p < .001, η2 = .74 F(1, 23) = 17.30, p < .001, η2 = .43 F(1, 23) = 1.90, ns