Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychometrika. 2016 Jul 11;81(4):1014–1045. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0

Table 4.

Parameter count for models with different identification conditions (K = 1). The structure is the same to Table 3.

T Λ ν diag(Θ) κ diag(Φ) diag(Σ) total
Total pG pG pG pG mG mG 0 G(4p + m(m + 3)/2)

Condition 7 pG pG 0 pG 0 0 pG
Condition 8 pG pG 0 0 0 0 0 G(2p + m(m − 1)/2)
MYT p (pm)G 0 pG m(G − 1) mG pm(G − 1)

T 0 pG pG pG 0 0 pG same as baseline
Λ pG 0 0 pG 0 0 0 same as baseline
ν or Θ same as Condition 8 same as baseline

T & Λ 0 0 pG pG 0 0 0 same as baseline
T & ν same as MYT same as baseline
T & Θ p pG p(G − 1) p 0 0 p same as baseline
Λ & ν same as loading invariance same as baseline
Λ & Θ pG p 0 p 0 m(G − 1) p G(p + m(m + 1)/2) + pm
ν & Θ same as Condition 8 same as baseline

T, Λ & ν p p 0 pG m(G − 1) m(G − 1) p G(p + m(m + 3)/2) + p − 2m
T, Λ & Θ p p p(G − 1) p 0 m(G − 1) p G(p + m(m + 1)/2) + pm
T, ν & Θ p pG 0 p mG 0 p G(p + m(m + 1)/2) + p
Λ, ν & Θ same as loading and unique variance invariance

all four p p 0 p m(G − 1) m(G − 1) p Gm(m + 3)/2 + 2p − 2m