Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178172

Table 5. Statistical significance of a posteriori effects.

F(df) P MNI Coordinates Cluster size
(voxels)
Anatomical region Contrasts used1
Effect A-B
221.77 (2, 120) < .001 34 24 -10 2907 R Inferior frontal gyrus (BA 47); Cerebellum posterior lobe (tonsil) Task B > A
Effect C-D
234.89 (2, 120) < .001 34 24 -10 2965 R Inferior frontal gyrus (BA 47); Cerebellum posterior lobe (tonsil) Task D > C
Effect A-C
226.2 (2, 120) < .001 34 24 -10 2807 R Inferior frontal gyrus (BA 47); Cerebellum posterior lobe (tonsil) Task A ≠ C
5.47 (2, 120) .005 -22 -20 -26 12 L Parahippocampal gyrus (BA 36)
Effect B-D
231.6 (2, 120) < .001 38 24 -10 2803 R Inferior frontal gyrus (BA 47); Cerebellum posterior lobe (tonsil) Task B ≠ D

F = Snedecor’s F statistic; df = degrees of freedom; p = statistical significance; MNI coordinates = x, y, z coordinates of cluster peaks; L = left; R = right; BA = Brodmann’s area.

1The first task/group presented more activation than the second task/group.