Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec 5;27(7):2903–2915. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4623-9

Table 4. Diagnostic accuracy measures for diagnosing LMS using different criterions to signify LMS.

Number of MR features present in a lesion Reader Sensitivity [95%CI; N] Specificity [95%CI; N] PPV [95%CI; N] NPV [95%CI; N] Accuracy [95% CI; N]
≥1 feature 1 1.00 [0.82-1.00;19/19] 0.55 [0.32-0.76;12/22] 0.66 [0.46-0.82;19/29] 1.00 [0.74-1.00;12/12] 0.76 [0.60-0.88;31/41]
2 1.00 [0.82-1.00;19/19] 0.59 [0.36-0.79;13/22] 0.68 [0.48-0.84;19/28] 1.00 [0.75-1.00;13/13] 0.78 [0.62-0.89;32/41]
≥2 features present 1 1.00 [0.82-1.00;19/19] 0.82 [0.60-0.95;18/22] 0.83 [0.61-0.95;19/23] 1.00 [0.81-1.00;18/18] 0.90 [0.77-0.97;37/41]
2 1.00 [0.82-1.00;19/19] 0.77 [0.55-0.92;17/22] 0.79 [0.58-0.93;19/24] 1.00 [0.80-1.00;17/17] 0.88 [0.74-0.96;36/41]
≥3 features present 1 1.00 [0.82-1.00;19/19] 0.95 [0.77-1.00;21/22] 0.95 [0.75-1.00;19/20] 1.00 [0.84-1.00;21/21] 0.98 [0.87-1.00;40/41]
2 0.95 [0.74-1.00;18/19] 1.00 [0.85-1.00;22/22] 1.00 [0.81-1.00;18/18] 0.96 [0.78-1.00;22/23] 0.98 [0.87-1.00;40/41]
4 features present 1 0.58 [0.33-0.80;11/19] 1.00 [0.85-1.00;22/22] 1.00 [0.72-1.00;11/11] 0.73 [0.54-0.88;22/30] 0.80 [0.65-0.91;33/41]
2 0.58 [0.33-0.80;11/19] 1.00 [0.85-1.00;22/22] 1.00 [0.72-1.00;11/11] 0.73 [0.54-0.88;22/30] 0.80 [0.65-0.91;33/41]

Note: MR magnetic resonance, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, CI confidence interval