Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Healthc (Amst). 2016 Dec 5;5(3):119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.09.002

Table 3a.

Physician pre- and post-study attitudes on specific components of the financial incentive program, physician incentive arm.

Baseline: mean (SD) (N = 52) Post-study: mean (SD) (N = 44)a
No unintended consequences of incentives 4.29 (0.57) 4.33 (0.51)
Clinical relevance of quality targets 4.11 (0.67) 4.07 (0.53)
Awareness and understanding of incentive program 3. 97 (0.57) 3. 61 (0.61)*
Control over resources needed to achieve quality targets 3.59 (0.65) 3.66 (0.51)
Salience of financial incentives 3.45 (0.92) 3.57 (0.78)
Ability to secure cooperation of other staff 3.05 (0.74) 2.94 (0.73)
Impact on clinical practice 2.75 (0.54) 2.27 (0.65)*

Scale ranges from 1 to 7.

a

N = 36 for no unintended consequences, control, and financial salience.

*

P < 0.01 between pre- and post-study, paired sample t-test.